Justice
For
Shawn Moses
A social justice effort bringing attention to the prosecutorial & police misconduct
Justice for What?
This page is dedicated into telling the story and providing knowledge into the misconduct that happened to Shawn Moses as well as millions of others in the United States.
Our Mission
Our mission is to shed light and give knowledge as to how different factors of misconduct that has been served to Shawn Moses and how you can train yourself as well as be informed as to the the ways and situations that can possibly have you in the same situation.
Police Misconduct
What is Police Misconduct?
Police Misconduct refers to inappropriate or illegal behavior by law enforcement officers that violates ethical standards, departmental policies, or legal statutes. It encompasses a range of actions, both on and off duty, that undermine the integrity of the police force and erode public trust.
There are many ways that this can happen such as excessive use of force,Bribery and Corruption,False Arrest and Detention,Racial Profiling and Discrimination,Misuse of Authority,Fabrication of Evidence,Unlawful Search and Seizure,Failure to Follow Procedures,Sexual Misconduct,Retaliation and Cover-Ups.
In the case for Shawn Moses there was three instances that caused this type of ,misconduct.
- Police offices had the same last name on (2) Separate cases similar to this
- Police officer’s son was the one involved in break in of the defendants apartment
- Police report filed against complaint at the 19th District sabotaged intent not to properly file so there would be no invest or preliminary hearing
PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT
Prosecutorial misconduct refers to inappropriate or illegal actions taken by a prosecutor during the course of a legal proceeding. This can undermine the fairness of the trial and can include a range of behaviors, such as witholding evidence, misleading the court or jury, improper argument, witness tampering and improper conduct.
In the case for Shawn Moses three things took place.
1.)The prosecutor on the initial court date: 8/8/2017 submitted a incomplete criminal extract of complainant: Brian Atkerson / Brady viol.
withholding).
2.) 3 month Itr. submitted the same partial extract to defense on
11-6-2017 trial with trial already underway (United States v. Alvin 30
F.Sup 323) ” Delayed disclosure”
A.D.A. Malloy misrepresented the conviction of the complainant| Fraud upon the courty
Requested that text message be precluded because she had not received them. “Use of Deception” because bail hearing transcript record reflects A.D.A knew of the text messages eight months prior to trial. The defense precluded witness Annie Moss-Perkins personally attempted to hand her the text messages at bail hearing.(6th Amend Viol. of Confrontation cause
How Can I Help
DONATE
SOCIALS
REACH OUT
Contact Us
If you’re interested in learning more about how you can get involved and make a difference, we’d love to hear from you! Please reach out to us with any questions or for more information on how you can contribute.